The Origins of Christianity
By Acharya S
Footnotes Page 2
Wheless: ". . . the Hebrew and Greek religious forgers were so ignorant or careless
of the principles of criticism, that they 'interpolated' their fraudulent new matter into old manuscripts without taking care to erase or
suppress the previous statements glaringly contradicted by the new interpolations." The Church forgery
mill did not limit itself to mere writings but for centuries cranked out thousands of phony "relics" of its "Lord," "Apostles" and
"Saints." The Shroud of Turin, among innumerable others, is counted in this group."There were at least 26 'authentic' burial shrouds
scattered throughout the abbeys of Europe, of which the Shroud of Turin is just one. . . .The Shroud of Turin is one of the many relics
manufactured for profit during the Middle Ages. Shortly after the Shroud emerged it was declared a fake by the bishop who discovered the
artist. This is verified by recent scientific investigation which found paint in the image areas. The Shroud of Turin is also not
consistent with Gospel accounts of Jesus' burial, which clearly refer to multiple cloths and a separate napkin over his face." (Freethought
Datasheet #5, Atheists United) At one point, a number of churches claimed the one foreskin of Jesus, and there were enough splinters of the
"True Cross" that Calvin said the amount of wood would make "a full load for a good ship." (Walker) The disgraceful list of absurdities and
frauds goes on, and, as Pope Leo X claimed, it has been enormously profitable for the Church. And where the fraud failed, fear and force
prevailed, as millions were subjected to horrible tortures and murders in the name of the pretended "Prince of Peace," during an abysmally
dark Age of Faith that propelled the world into a state of ignorance.
McKlintock and Strong's Cyclopædia of Theological Literature.
Mangasarian. Wheless: "The fact is, that with the exception of this one incongruous forged passage, section 3, the
wonder-mongering Josephus makes not the slightest mention of his wonder-working fellow-countryman, Jesus the Christ - though some score of
other Joshuas, or Jesuses, are recorded by him, nor does he mention any of his transcendent wonders."
Massey, Mangasarian, Taylor. Zealous defender of the faith Eusebius never mentions the Tacitus passage, nor does anyone else prior
to the 15th century C.E. (Taylor)
Who is this King of Glory?, p. 258-9.
See Taylor and Wheless for more on the fraudulent nature of these passages. "It has always been unfailing source of astonishment
to the historical investigator of Christian beginnings, that there is not a single word from the pen of any Pagan writer of the first
century of our era, which can in any fashion be referred to the marvellous story recounted by the Gospel writer. The very existence of
Jesus seems unknown." (Mead, Did Jesus Live 100 B.C.?)
Gnostic and Historic Christianity by Massey (see below). See also The Diegesis by Rev. Robert Taylor, The World's Sixteen Crucified Saviors by Kersey Graves, Pagan Christs by JM Robertson, any works by Hilton Hotema, Pagan and Christian Creeds by Edward Carpenter, and Deceptions and Myths of the Bible by Lloyd Graham. Although some historicizers may glom onto these dates as proof that the research is outdated, this is simply not
true. These numbers are provided here to demonstrate that this truth has been known, and has been suppressed by vested interests, for a
Graves, p. 15. "'We cannot,' says the celebrated Orientalist, Sir William Jones, 'refuse to the Vedas the honor of an antiquity
the most distant.'" (Jacolliot, The Bible in India) Indeed, certain scholars have opined that the Rig Veda contains mention of an astronomical configuration that could only have
occurred 90,000 years ago; it true, this would attest that the Veda was recording the experience of someone far too advanced for that
period, according to the standardized anthrolopogical perspective, not to mention that the Veda would represent the world's oldest
"historical" recording, although the actual physically extant copies are, obviously, very recent. Ancient scribes India mostly used, as
occurs in some places today, leaves to write on, and these were endlessly copied over the thousands of years. As everywhere, knowledge was
also passed along orally. This subject opens up the debate as to whether ancient India or Egypt was the progenitor of Western and Middle
Eastern culture. Both have claims to extreme antiquity. The question is who came first within the Mythos, Brahma-Krishna or Osiris-Horus?
Based on linguistical evidence, many scholars have concluded it was India. However, the ancient Egyptian language is not fully known, nor
has the extent of its influence been adequately examined. Walker hypothesizes that "Horus" was "Heruka" of India, indicating that the Horus
myth succeeded and was built upon the Indian. The chronology of the Brahmins goes back millions of years, and there has been effort made by
such Hare Krishna authors as Thompson and Cremo to push civilization, rather than man's apelike progenitors, back at least to that period.
Obviously, such "Forbidden Archeology" is widely dismissed for seeming lack of solid evidence. What is known is that the Judeo-Christian
bible can be found in earlier versions in both countries. Thus, it is the rehash of the well-developed systems and ideologies (Ritual and
Mythos) of both nations. (See Jacolliot and Massey.)
Many on this list come from The World's Sixteen Crucified Saviors by Graves. This is not to suggest that all of these
godmen characters were utilized in the formation of the Christian myth, as overt contact had not occurred in such places as Mexico or
Bermuda. Also, modern orthodoxy does not allow for the dates provided by Graves, i.e., that Quetzalcoatl originates in the 6th B.C.E., a
date far too early in the orthodox perspective. However, we utilize this list to demonstrate that the same concepts are found worldwide
with and without cultural exchange, because they are derived from the same astrotheological observations. Also, we are in
concurrence with the "ancient advanced civilization" theory ("Atlantis") that would allow for one or more centralized civilizations to have
spread throughout the world during a very remote period in protohistory, thus taking with it the well-developed Mythos and Ritual, which
would then mutate into the various forms found around the globe.
Taylor quotes the letter of Emperor Hadrian (134 C.E.): "The worshippers of Serapis are Christians, and those are devoted to the
God Serapis, who (I find) call themselves the bishops of Christ."
Walker: ". . . Later, an unknown Gospel writer inserted the story of doubting Thomas, who insisted on touching Jesus. This was to
combat the heretical idea that there was no resurrection in the flesh, and also to subordinate Jerusalem's municipal god Tammuz (Thomas) to
the new savior. Actually, the most likely source of primary Christian mythology was the Tammuz cult in Jerusalem." The "doubting Thomas"
character also finds its place in the Mythos, as the "genius" of the time when the sun is at its weakest (winter solstice).
The Sibylline Oracles, books produced over time allegedly by a number of pagan prophetesses called Sibyls, were widely regarded in
the ancient world prior to the advent of the Christian era. "The Sibyls are quoted frequently by the early Fathers and Christian writers,
Justin, Athenagoras, Theophilus, Clement of Alexandria, etc." (Catholic Encyclopedia, cited by Wheless) These books or Oracles
were often cited by Christians as proof of their religion. For instance, the following is considered a Sibylline Oracle: "With five loaves
at the same time, and with two fishes, He shall satisfy five thousand men in the wilderness; And afterwards taking all the fragments that
remain, He shall fill twelve baskets to the hope of many. . . .He shall still the winds by His word, and calm the sea as it rages, treading
with feet of peace and faith. . . . He shall walk on the waves, He shall release men from disease. He shall raise the dead, and drive away
many pains. . ." (Wheless) Although the Christians interpreted this as a prophecy of Christ becoming fulfilled, it is in fact an aspect of
the ubiquitous Mythos and was already said of Horus, for one, hundreds of years earlier. It has never referred to an actual man but, once
again, is astrotheological. The fact that it purportedly existed prior to the Christian era constitutes proof to those who use logic that
the Christians utilized it in creating their Christ character, rather than it acting as a prophecy of their godman. As they did with other
texts, the Christians forged and interpolated many passages into the well-known Oracles in order to cement their fiction and convert
followers. It is also amusing to note that the Christians had to resort to despised "pagan" documents for their enterprise, especially
since they spent their lives attempting to demonstrate that everything that preceded them was "of the devil." This then implies that
Christianity was also a work of the devil.
Pagan Christs by JM Robertson.
In Gnostic and Historian Christianity, Massey says, "In . . . Buddhism in Christendom, [author] Mr. Lillie
thinks he has found Jesus, the author of Christianity, as one of the Essenes, and a Buddhist! But there is no need of craning one's neck
out of joint in looking to India, or straining in that direction at all, for the origin of that which was Egyptian born and Gnostic bred!
Essenism was no new birth of Hindu Buddhism brought to Alexandria about two centuries before our era; and Christianity, whether considered
to be mystical or historical, was not derived from Buddhism at any time. They have some things in common, because there is a Beyond to
both." We will add that the Egyptians refined the Mythos in exquisite and overwhelming detail, but linguistical theory has in the past, and
now again with the Nostratic theory, traced the origins of Western and Middle Eastern language and culture in large part to India. It is
yet difficult to say which came first, Krishna, the predecessor of Buddha, or Osiris-Horus. Certainly Horus was a well-developed savior-god
by the time attributed to THE Buddha. There would be no need to build Horus upon Buddha (Egyptian "Putha" or "Ptah"), and it is true that
Christianity did not need to rely on the doctrines of Buddhism, having the complete Mythos at hand. However, we do know absolutely that
there was cultural exchange between the West/Levant and the Buddhistic world of the Far East prior to the inception of Christianity, in the
form of travelers, traders, and monks of the vast brotherhood network, who were constantly exchanging information concerning religion, the
esoteric gnosis, and the Mythos and Ritual. Also, it has been suggested that there was at least one group of Brahmanic and Vedic scholars
living in the Levant prior to the founding of Christianity. These individuals, who would likely be members of one or more aspects of the
brotherhood network, would certainly also be exchanging information about the very ancient Krishna, et al., and contributing to the culture
around them. It is not only entirely possible but probable that Hindus ventured to the Levant over the millennia. But they would not have
needed to, in order to spread their version of the Mythos, since there were those, such as Alexander the Great, who went to them. Indeed,
Louis Jacolliot expertly traces the Judeo-Christian Bible back to India, noting many similarities between the Hindu and Christian
priesthoods. (The Bible in India) There are also quite a few similarities between the Catholic and Tibetan Buddhist hierarchies
and rituals. The influence from the Far East has come in waves beginning several thousand years ago, and culture may have begun to develop
there in in the protohistoric period some 12,000 years ago or more. If the reckonings of maverick Egyptologists are accurate, however,
Egypt would have been developing simultaneously with this Indian culture, the origins of both, then, being a possibly much older
civilization. There is no question, however, that the archaic Indian language Sanskrit or its Nostratic predecessor has highly influenced
many of the Western/Middle Eastern languages. Therefore, there has unquestionably been early and ongoing contact, and with language comes
religion. "The ancient peoples of India were Asiatic Ethiopians, and it should not surprise us that they shared common traditions with
their brothers in Africa." (John Jackson, Christianity Before Christ)
Some people have tried to dispute the "virgin" status of Buddha's mother. However, in the first place, it should be remembered
that the "life of the Buddha" does not represent the biography of a person but is an account of a solar hero; thus, the typical solar
attribute would be appropriate. In any case, Joseph McCabe relates: " . . . Mr. Robertson shows from St. Jerome that the Buddhists
themselves did call Maya 'a virgin' - they believed in a 'virgin birth' - and he rightly rejects the statement of Professor Rhys Davids
that these Buddhists understood the birth of Buddha quite differently from the Christians because 'before his descent into his mother's
womb he was a deva.' That is exactly what Christians say of Jesus."
See Temple of the Recumbent Buddha for artifacts proving the motif of Buddha and the 12.
Mead, p. 133.
Graves, p. 118.
Isis Unveiled by Helena Blavatsky, vol. II, pp. 209, 537-538.
Massey, MC, p. 150.
Mead, p. 134.
The Secret of Christ
Dr. Burkhard Scherer
Walker says, "Of all savior-gods worshipped at the beginning of the Christian era, Osiris may have contributed more details to the
evolving Christ figure than any other. Already very old in Egypt, Osiris was identified with nearly every other Egyptian god and was on the
way to absorbing them all. He had well over 200 divine names. He was called the Lord of Lords, King of Kings, God of Gods. He was the
Resurrection and the Life, the Good Shepherd, Eternity and Everlastingness, the god who 'made men and women to be born again.' Budge says,
'From first to last, Osiris was to the Egyptians the god-man who suffered, and died, and rose again, and reigned eternally in heaven. They
believed that they would inherit eternal life, just as he had done. . . . Osiris's coming was announced by Three Wise Men: the three stars
Mintaka, Anilam, and Alnitak in the belt of Orion, which point directly to Osiris's star in the east, Sirius (Sothis), significator of his
birth. . . . Certainly Osiris was a prototypical Messiah, as well as a devoured Host. His flesh was eaten in the form of communion cakes of
wheat, the 'plant of Truth.' . . . The cult of Osiris contributed a number of ideas and phrases to the Bible. The 23rd Psalm copied an
Egyptian text appealing to Osiris the Good Shepherd to lead the deceased to the 'green pastures' and 'still waters' of the
nefer-nefer land, to restore the soul to the body, and to give protection in the valley of the shadow of death (the Tuat). The
Lord's Prayer was prefigured by an Egyptian hymn to Osiris-Amen beginning. 'O Amen, O Amen, who are in heaven.' Amen was also invoked at
the end of every prayer."
The celestial manger in the Mythos is also thought of as a cave. (Massey) Although Jesus is typically depicted as being born in a
manger, early Christian tradition places Jesus's birth in a cave, like that of many other preceding gods. Walker: "The cave was universally
identified with the womb of Mother Earth, the logical place for symbolic birth and regeneration. . . . Like Adonis, Jesus was born of a
consecrated temple maiden in the sacred cave of Bethlehem, 'The House of God.'"
Massey, Churchward, et al. Massey (MC) says, ". . . the Star in the East will afford undeniable data for showing the mythical and
celestial origin of the gospel history. When the divine child is born, the wise men or magi declare that they have seen his star in the
east. The wise men are identified as the Three Kings of other legends who are not to be derived from the canonical gospels. The three kings
or three solar representatives are as ancient as the male triad that was first typified when the three regions were established as heaven,
earth, and nether-world, from which the triad bring their gifts. . . When the birthplace was in the sign of the Bull [6,000 years ago], the
Star in the East that arose to announce the birth of the babe was Orion, which is therefore called the star of Horus. That was once the
star of the three kings; for the 'three kings' is still a name of three stars in Orion's belt . . . "
Like Jesus, Horus has no history between the ages of 12 and 30. "And the mythos alone will account for the chasm which is wide and
deep enough to engulf a supposed history of 18 years." (Massey, MC) There exists a very old Egyptian papyrus dated to 75 C.E. but based on
an older document, which contains a story about the "Son of Osiris" (i.e., the "Son of God") that parallels in a number of details the
gospel narratives. The Son of God is claimed to have wondrous powers and to have outwitted all of the teachers in the Temple of Ptah. In
the papyrus is also related a tale of two dead men that closely resembles the biblical fable of Dives and Lazarus (Lk. 16:19-31).
Massey: "Horus in Egypt had been a fish from time immemorial, and when the equinox entered the sign of Pisces, Horus, was
portrayed as Ichthys with the fish sign of over his head." Dujardin: "The patriarch Joshua, who was plainly an ancient god of
Palestine and bore the same name as the god of Christianity, is called the son of Nun, which signifies 'son of the fish.'" Walker: "The
fish symbol of the yonic Goddess was so revered throughout the Roman empire that Christian authorities insisted on taking it over, with
extensive revision of myths to deny its earlier female-genital meanings." Wheless: "The fish anagram was an ancient Pagan symbol of
fecundity . . ."
Churchward, op cit., p. 365. See also The Book Your Church Doesn't Want You to Read, pp. 15-16.
Churchward, ibid., p. 397. See also The Egyptian Book of the Deadby Massey, pp. 13 and 64; MC.
Churchward. Massey, MC: "It was the gnostic art that reproduced the Hathor-Meri and Horus of Egypt as the Virgin and
child-Christ of Rome . . . .You poor idiotai [idiots], said the Gnostics [to the early Christians], you have mistaken
the mysteries of old for modern history, and accepted literally all that was only meant mystically."
Walker: "The cave of the Vatican belonged to Mithra until 376 A.D., when a city prefect suppressed the cult of the rival Savior and
seized the shrine in the name of Christ, on the very birthday of the pagan god, December 25." Shmuel Golding, in The Book Your
Church: "Paul says, 'They drank from that spiritual rock and that rock was Christ' (I Cor. 10:4). These are identical words to those
found in the Mithraic scriptures, except that the name Mithra is used instead of Christ. The Vatican hill in Rome that is regarded as
sacred to Peter, the Christian rock, was already sacred to Mithra. Many Mithraic remains have been found there. The merging of the worship
of Attis into that of Mithra, then later into that of Jesus, was effected almost without interruption."
Robertson. Wheless: "Mithraism is one of the oldest religious systems on earth, as it dates from the dawn of history before the
primitive Iranian race divided into sections which became Persian and Indian . . . When in 65-63 B.C., the conquering armies of Pompey were
largely converted by its high precepts, they brought it with them into the Roman Empire. Mithraism spread with great rapidity throughout
the Empire, and it was adopted, patronized and protected by a number of the Emperors up to the time of Constantine." Of Mithraism, the
Catholic Encyclopedia states, as related by Wheless: "The fathers conducted the worship. The chief of the fathers, a sort
of pope, who always lived at Rome, was called 'Pater Patratus."'
Taylor: "'That Popery has borrowed its principal ceremonies and doctrines from the rituals of Paganism,' is a fact which the most
learned and orthodox of the established church have most strenuously maintained and most convincingly demonstrated."