|
Mithra and the Twelve
The theme of the teaching god and "the
Twelve" is found within Mithraism, as Mithra is depicted
surrounded by the 12 zodiac signs on a number of monuments and
in the writings of Porphyry, for one. Regarding the Twelve,
Robertson says:
On Mithraic monuments we find
representations of twelve episodes, probably corresponding
to the twelve labors in the stories of Heracles, Samson and
other Sun-heroes, and probably also connected with
initiation.
As they have been in the case of numerous
sun gods, these signs could be called Mithra's 12 "companions"
or "disciples." Indeed, concerning Mithra and the Twelve, Freke
and Gandy say:
During the initiation ceremony in the
Mysteries of Mithras, 12 disciples surrounded the godman,
just as the 12 disciples surrounded Jesus.
Again, they state:
In the Mysteries of Mithras, as already
mentioned, the initiated representing Mithras stood in the
middle of a circle of 12 dancers representing the signs of
the zodiac.
Furthermore, the motif of the 12 disciples
or followers in a "last supper" is recurrent in the Pagan
world, including within Mithraism:
[Mark] gave Jesus a last supper with twelve
followers, identical in every way with the last supper of
the Persian god Mithra, down to the cannibalisation of the
god's body in the form of bread and wine (14:22-26).
The Spartan King Kleomenes had held a
similar last supper with twelve followers four hundred years
before Jesus.
This last assertion is made by Plutarch in
Parallel Lives,
"Agis and Kleomenes" 37:2-3.
Obviously, the Last Supper with the Twelve
predates Christianity by centuries. It would therefore be a
mistake to contend that Mithraism copied Christianity, rather
than inheriting this motif from earlier Pagan religions.
The Baptism
The sprinkling or splashing of the bull's
blood is considered a baptism, especially since it is designed
to convey immortality. Like this bloody rite, baptism with
water, whether by immersion or sprinkling, is found in numerous
pre-Christian religions/cults, dating back to ancient times.
Baptism or lustration for the removal of evil or sins is also
found in the Sumerian culture, 2,000 or more years before the
Christian era. In Sumero-Babylonian religion, baptism was used
as a rite of exorcism, likewise a concept long pre-dating the
Christian era. The Sumero-Babylonian Trinity included Anu,
Enlil and Ea, the last of whom was the "personification of
divine healing power." This Triad, along with Marduk, was
invoked to dispel sickness. Individually, Ea was the god of
healing waters, while his temple was "the house of the depth of
the ocean" or "the house of wisdom." Ea's city was Eridu, which
possessed potent waters:
Originally it was the life-giving waters
that neutralized, expelled or absorbed the malevolent
influences and so freed those who had come into contact with
evil from its contagion because being the substance out of
which the universe was created it was endowed with all its
creative potentialities. The location of the ancient city
made it the natural cult centre of the god of the waters
whose function was that of "washing away," purging, or in
some way removing evil as a miasma. So in the texts Ea is
represented as the god who above all delivered men from sin,
disease, pollution, and demoniacal assaults, as well as
being the source of supernatural knowledge.
As concerns the Babylonian exorcism, not
much different from the Catholic, James further states:
In addition to pronouncing the name of the
divinity in which the magic virtue resides, the exorcist had
to mention that of the demon to be driven forth. This
involved the recitation of long lists of devils and ghostsin
order to include the one that might be the cause of the
malady. The patient was then sprinkled with water, censed,
surrounded with flour or some other magically protective
substance such as black and white yam fastened to his couch,
while the exorcist held in his hand a branch of the sacred
tamarisk, "the powerful weapon of Anu," during the
incantation.
Concerning baptism among the pre-Christian
"heathen" and Jews, the Catholic Encyclopedia ("Baptism")
states:
How natural and expressive the symbolism of
exterior washing to indicate interior purification was
recognized to be, is plain from the practice also of the
heathen systems of religion. The use of lustral water is
found among the Babylonians, Assyrians, Egyptians, Greeks,
Romans, Hindus, and others. A closer resemblance to
Christian baptism is found in a form of Jewish baptism, to
be bestowed on proselytes, given in the Babylonian Talmud
(Dollinger, First Age of the Church).
Regarding baptism, Bonwick states:
Baptism is a very ancient rite pertaining to
heathen religions, whether of Asia, Africa, Europe or
America. It was one of the Egyptian rites in the
mysteries.
Indeed, the baptism by water to remove sins
is an ancient Egyptian motif:
Osiris takes upon himself "all that is
hateful" in the dead: that is, he adopts the burden of his
sins; and the dead is purified by the typical sprinkling of
water.
This baptism for the remission of sins was
"in vogue" in the 5th and 6th Dynasties,
2400 or so years before the Christian era. Such baptism
doubtlessly existed in the neighboring Canaanite culture as
well; it certainly was practiced in Palestine prior to Christ's
purported advent, as Lundy relates:
The sacred annual bathing of Palestine
pilgrims in the river Jordan is the same now as it was in
John the Baptist's time; and precisely the same as it is and
always has been in the sacred rivers of Hindustan. It is a
custom far older than Christianity, and universally
prevalent. John the Baptist simply adopted and practised the
universal custom of sacred bathing for the remission of
sins.
Lundy then elaborates upon the ubiquitous
baptism:
Now as Baptism of some kind has been the
universal custom of all religious nations and peoples for
purification and regeneration, it is not to be wondered at
that it had found its way from high Asia, the centre of the
old world's religion and civilization, into the American
continent. So great was the resemblance between the two
sacraments of the Christian Church and those of the ancient
Mexicans; so many other points of similarity, also, in
doctrine existed, as to the unity of God, the Triad, the
Creation, the Incarnation and Sacrifice, the Resurrection,
etc., that Herman Witsius, no mean scholar and thinker, was
induced to believe that Christianity had been preached on
this continent by some one of the Apostles, perhaps St.
Thomas, from the fact that he is reported to have carried
the Gospel to India and Tartary, whence he came to America.
Whether this be so or not, and making all due allowance for
Spanish enthusiasm at detecting resemblance where none might
exist, but such resemblances, too, as the poor Lazarite Huc
and his companion noticed between some of the religious
ceremonies of the Tartars and those of the Roman Church, for
publishing which he was expelled from the order, and died of
a broken heart; yet the fact remains, as acknowledged by
such men as Humboldt, and our own Prescott, who were
certainly no religious enthusiasts, of a very close
similarity between some of the doctrines and practices of
the ancient Mexican religion and Christianity.
As can be seen, included in these
similarities between the Mexican and Christian religions was
the practice of baptism, wherein the "American priests were
found in Mexico beyond Darien, baptizing boys and girls a year
old in the temple at the cross, pouring water upon them from a
small pitcher." The Mexicans also celebrated a "holy
supper," communion or eucharist as well. According to a
Spanish source, a Mexican priest told him these rituals and
concepts were brought by a man, "clad after the Spanish
fashion, and bearded," who entered their country and
attempted to "lead them to the obedience of God"; however,
when their chiefs would not accept the faith, another man
came with a sword, which led to warfare and strife. This
account is muddled and incomplete, and there is no evidence
of Christian influence on the culture, no remnants of
language or writing, no foreign elements at all. While there
may have beenand certainly were, based on archaeological
evidencebearded "Semitic" men in Central America (long
anterior to the Christian era), it is likely that this
account was embellished with the part about this teacher
being "clad after the Spanish fashion." Concerning these
correspondences and the European theory of their origin,
Lundy comments:
Here, then, are nudity, washing, sprinkling,
exorcism, renunciation of Satan, and confirmation, in one
and the same baptism, just as in the Primitive and Greek
Churches. And yet it cannot be Christian Baptism, unless the
ancient Mexicans had relapsed into Asiatic paganism between
the advent of some Apostle and that of the Spaniards. For
their great water goddess is only the counterpart of
Aphrodite, all the Asiatic world over.
The formidable bearded man who came across
the sea and taught the Mexicans their religion and their
civilization, and then retired with the promise of return,
was doubtless the incarnate deity Quetzalcoatl, god of the
air, who, while on earth, taught them the use of metals,
agriculture, an the arts of government, and made the golden
age of Anahuc. He it was that some of the Spanish
antiquaries and Witsius thought to be St. Thomas; while
others more truly discerned in him a type of the Messiah,
such as we have found in Agni, Krishna, Mithra, Horus, and
Apollo.
In other words, the "bearded man,"
Quetzalcoatl, is not only an "air god" but also a sun god, and
these Mexican rites are not "Christian" but proto-Christian. In
fact, as abundantly demonstrated, these various important
religious motifs and rites existed long before the Christian
era, and were not copied by Paganism from Christianity but the
other way around.
The antiquity of baptism within Judaism is
indicated not only by the story of Christ's baptism but also by
the words of Paul at 1 Corinthians 10:1-4, where, in addressing
his "brethren, Paul refers to the passing of "our ancestors"
"through the sea, and all were baptized in Moses" He also
mentions that the "supernatural Rock" that followed the
ancestors (out of Egypt) was Christ.
The Mithraic Eucharist
Another of these pre-Christian doctrines
found in Paganism in general and Mithraism in specific is the
Eucharist, Last Supper or Holy Communion. From early ages, the
Mithraic eucharist, which was said to bestow immortality upon
the participants, has been recognized to parallel that of the
Christians. In reality, the rite is likewise very old and
certainly did not find its way into Paganism from Christianity.
The Catholic Encyclopedia concedes that the eucharist is
pre-Christian:
Mithraism had a Eucharist, but the idea of a
sacred banquet is as old as the human race and existed at all
ages and amongst all peoples.
The eucharist includes the "doctrine of
transubstantiation," which claims that the wine or water and
bread of the sacred meal are mystically and magically
transmuted into the blood and body of the god, which, it is
believed, creates union with the god. At the Mithraic ceremony,
the following was said:
"He who will not eat of my body, nor drink
of my blood so that he may be one with me and I with him,
shall not be saved." (Mithraic Communion, M.J. Vermaseren,
Mithras, The Secret
God)
Obviously, as is the case with the eucharist
itself, this ritual line is not original to Christianity. It
was, in fact, part of the pre-Christian mysteries, including,
among others, those of Samothrace and Attis.
Discussing the typical reason behind
initiation into a mystery religion, Guignebert also explains
the meaning of the eucharist:
The initiate is assured, at any rate for a
considerable period of time, that his fate will be the same
as that of Attis at his inevitable death and a happy
resurrection and survival among the gods his portion. In
many of the cults of these savior and interceding gods, such
as those of Cybele, Mithra, the Syrian Baals, and still
others, the beneficial union obtained by means of initiation
is renewed, or at any rate revived, by sacred repasts which
the members, assembled at the table of the god,
ate.
Concerning the last supper and
transubstantiation, Weigall elucidates:
The ceremony of eating an incarnate god's
body and drinking his blood is, of course, of very ancient,
and originally cannibalistic, inception, and there are
several sources from which the Christian rite may be derived
if, as most critics think, it was not instituted as an
actual ceremony by Jesus; but its connection with the
Mithraic rite is the most apparent.
Regarding the transubstantiation doctrine,
Frazer says:
The doctrine of transubstantiation, or the
magical conversion of the bread into flesh, was also
familiar to the Aryans of ancient India long before the
spread and even the rise of Christianity.
Since the Persians who worshipped Mithra
were originally of the same ethnicity as the Indians who
revered Mitra, it would be logical to assert that this rite
within Mithraism is likewise ancient, possibly dating to early
or pre-Vedic times, 1500 years or more before the Christian
era. Indeed, the eucharist or communion was part of the ancient
Persian religion, apart from Mithraism:
The Greeks celebrated the mysteries of Ceres
and Bacchus as bestowers and protectors of grain and grapes;
the Aztecs partook with solemnity of a sacred perforated
cake, and, most similar of all to the "Holy Communion" of
the Christians, was the Haoma sacrifice of the Persians, a
resemblance so striking as to draw from the early fathers of
the church the complaint that the Devil had played a trick
upon Christ in teaching the Parsis to caricature the
Eucharist in their Soma sacrifice.
Haoma was originally the
extracted juice of the Soma plant (Asclepias acida), an
intoxicating liquid with the ancient Aryans poured upon the
sacrificial fire, and also drank themselves, as a symbol of
divine life and immortality.
The sacrifice was originally
Brahmanic.
The soma or haoma drink was a psychedelic or
entheogenic plant potion that imbued godly feelings and seeming
capacities of omniscience, omnipresence and omnipotence. In the
Rig Veda, Soma is lauded as a deity, and Indra's divine
strength and immortality are attributed to the plant god. The
Vedic and Persian religions, of course, were not the only
faiths to have as part of their mysteries such psychedelic
plant-drugs; intimations are to be detected in Judaism and
Christianity as well.
The "last supper" can be found within the
Egyptian religion, again, as part of the mysteries.
Furthermore, the Eleusinian Mysteries included the sharing of
the Goddess Ceres's "body" (bread) and the God Dionysus's
"blood" (wine), centuries before the Christian era. The
eucharist is found also in Syria, an area in which Mithraism
flourished. Indeed, the pre-Christian Essenes, some of whom
became Christians, participated in not only baptism but also a
"sacred meal":
The holy daily meal of the Essenes was
preceded by the solemnity of a water baptism. The members of
the secret society, who had sworn not to communicate a certain
knowledge to the uninitiated, appeared in their "white garments
as if they were sacred," they went into the refectory "purified
as into a holy temple," and prayer was offered up before and
after the sacred meal. It can only be compared with the Paschal
meal of the other Jews. The bread figured in both, whilst among
the Essenes water took the place of the wine at their meal on
common days.
As reflected in the "Rule of the Community"
(1QS 6:4-5), the Zadokites of the Dead Sea scrolls also
celebrated the "sacred meal," apparently at least 100 years
before the common era:
And when the table has been prepared for
eating, and the new wine for drinking, the Priest shall be the
first to stretch out his hand to bless the first-fruits of the
bread and new wine.
The Zadokites were in part Melchizedekians
and had likely practiced this rite for centuries. In fact, the
bread-and-wine sacrament is also proved to be pre-Christian by
its presence in the Bible, in which Melchizedek, the "priest of
the Most High God" and "best type of Monotheist of the
non-Jewish race," uses the sacrament to initiate
Abraham (Gen. 14:18). Harwood argues that the Melchizedek
rite was a true communion, with the doctrine of
transubstantiation:
It was in the form of bread and wine that
the god Ilion (Allah) was eaten by the priest-king
Molokhiy-Tsedek [Melchizedek] in c. 1800 BCE (GEN. 14:18).
It was in the form of bread and barley wine that the
Egyptian Book of the
Dead at about the same time instructed worshippers of
the resurrected-savior-god Osiris to eat his flesh and drink
his blood.
Indeed, the sacrament would have little
significance if it did not represent God (El); in actuality,
much is made of this particular transaction, as it served to
establish Abraham as "a priest for ever, after the order of
Melchizedek" (Ps. 110:4), in essence transferring the power
from the Gentile priesthood to the Jewish.
The ritual of theophagy, or the eating of
gods/goddesses, Harwood further asserts, has been practiced by
humans for some 30,000 years. Obviously, this practice is novel
neither to Mithraism nor Christianity, and there was certainly
no need for the former to take it from the latter.
As concerns the origins of various "modes of
expression and images" found in the New Testament, Drews traces
them to "the common treasuryof the secret sects of the Orient,"
especially in the Mandean religion and Mithraism. Naming "the
rock," "the water," "the bread," "the book," "the vine," "the
good shepherd" and other concepts, Drews states that these
expressions are "in part known" from the Rig Veda, concerning
Agni, whom, we have seen, is one of the
oldest known prototypes for the Christ character and various
of its earlier permutations, such as Buddha and Krishna.
|